IOP Publishing
Browse
erl467625f3_online.jpg (127.09 kB)

Probability distribution of TI at the (a) SW and (b) NE locations during the day (solid) and night (dashed) for the unwaked (#1, black) SW farm-waked (#2, red), SW direct-waked (#3, blue), NE farm-waked (#4, green) and NE direct-waked (#5, magenta) wind direction sectors

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2013-07-16, 00:00 authored by Craig M Smith, R J Barthelmie, S C Pryor

Figure 3. Probability distribution of TI at the (a) SW and (b) NE locations during the day (solid) and night (dashed) for the unwaked (#1, black) SW farm-waked (#2, red), SW direct-waked (#3, blue), NE farm-waked (#4, green) and NE direct-waked (#5, magenta) wind direction sectors.

Abstract

Observations of wakes from individual wind turbines and a multi-megawatt wind energy installation in the Midwestern US indicate that directly downstream of a turbine (at a distance of 190 m, or 2.4 rotor diameters (D)), there is a clear impact on wind speed and turbulence intensity (TI) throughout the rotor swept area. However, at a downwind distance of 2.1 km (26 D downstream of the closest wind turbine) the wake of the whole wind farm is not evident. There is no significant reduction of hub-height wind speed or increase in TI especially during daytime. Thus, in high turbulence regimes even very large wind installations may have only a modest impact on downstream flow fields. No impact is observable in daytime vertical potential temperature gradients at downwind distances of >2 km, but at night the presence of the wind farm does significantly decrease the vertical gradients of potential temperature (though the profile remains stably stratified), largely by increasing the temperature at 2 m.

History

Usage metrics

    Environmental Research Letters

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC