FDCS for the singlet (S, refer to equation (5)), triplet 1 (T1, refer to equation (6)) and triplet 2 (T2, refer to equations (6) and (7)) contributions are plotted as a function of θ2 in the θ-variable mode with θ1 = θq + 90°
Figure 6. FDCS for the singlet (S, refer to equation (5)), triplet 1 (T1, refer to equation (6)) and triplet 2 (T2, refer to equations (6) and (7)) contributions are plotted as a function of θ2 in the θ-variable mode with θ1 = θq + 90°. The kinematics used here are similar to figure 1 except E1 = E2 = 32.2 keV. Frame (a) Ca, frame (b) Mo and frame (c) Xe. The double-sided arrows in each frame indicate the θq ± 90° directions while the single-sided arrows in each frame indicate the θq and θ−q directions.
A detailed analysis on the spin aspects of the ejected electrons is presented for the electron impact K-shell double ionization of Ca, Mo and Xe atoms. The five-fold differential cross sections have been seperated in terms of singlet–singlet and singlet–triplet transitions during the double ionization of the K-shell electrons of atoms. This type of study has led us to unravel the interesting spin interplay of the ejected electrons and their higher degree of dependence with their kinematical arrangements in the continuum state. Various geometrical arrangements are identified wherein the important relative contributions of the singlet and triplet terms are found. The singlet contribution for the back-to-back emission of the ejected electrons is found to be smaller for the Ca atom, however, on the other hand, it becomes the dominating term for the Xe atom and is isotropic in nature. We also observe that the parallel spin orientation of the ejected electrons is more favourable for the perpendicular emission of the ejected electrons (i.e., when θ1 = θq and θ2 = θq − 90°) and it remains the dominant term regardless of the energy sharing ratio of the ejected electrons. All of the singlet and triplet transitions depend on the emission direction of the ejected electrons as well as on their energies.